Monday, December 20, 2010

Science--If You Don't Understand It, You Must Be a Dumb Female

I am so, so sick of this phrase:


Let's make clear exactly what this means. "Bitch" is a misogynist word used to denigrate women by suggesting that they are inferior. It is used to denigrate men by suggesting that they are women (and hence inferior). And it is used in the above context to suggest that those who do not understand science (or choose to put their faith in religion or woo in the place of science) are inferior--and hence, like women.

What boggles the mind is that the people who use this slogan (I'm sure it didn't escape your notice that the above t-shirt wearer is female) are often themselves women or men who know that women can be as brilliant in the sciences as men.

It's equivalent to the recent slew of politicians telling each other to "man up." It's just become so ingrained in our culture that politics and science are the realms of men. Sure, we'll let women into them now, but they'd better "get their man pants on," stop being "bitches," and renounce their stupid femininity to fit in with the men folk.

We write articles complaining that science is a boy's club, and how can we possibly get more wymens interested? Why don't we start by losing this:


Ms. magazine included this as one of their top ten ways to be a feminist:

Stop referring to women as bitches. I am really tired of hearing the b- word used so often, and casually, as if it doesn’t have any meaning at all. Right now, many young, self-described political liberals, who do not use the f- word to refer to queer men because that word is offensive, still use the b- word regularly as a way to refer to the ladies. Why is the word bitch now classified as a slang term, and not as a serious insult? . . .

So, let’s talk about what the word bitch actually means: 1. “a woman,” 2. “a woman who gets angry or disagrees with you,” and 3. “a man who is weak, (like we expect a woman to be.)” In case you hadn’t noticed, the word’s dual, and yes, contradictory meaning functions to criticize men and women alike. Anyone who dares to cross over into enemy territory gets branded with an insulting label, discouraging her or him from ever visiting that territory again. Perhaps this is why people love to use this word so much. Like a particularly good police officer, Officer B does twice the work of any other officer on the streets. Officer B effectively enforces the boundaries between the neighborhoods of men and women. And, if you ever talk back to Officer B, if you ever challenge the authority of that word, that’s the easiest way to get labeled a bitch yourself!

To me, the worst part of people’s constant use of the b- word is that it actually makes women fear they’re going to be labeled the b- word for doing anything outside the norm. This includes, but is not limited to: Women standing up for themselves, women fighting back at the social construction of gender, women getting angry about anything in general, and women asserting themselves.

Let's add "women learning more about science" to this list. This is exactly why I have stopped using the word altogether. Let's get this straight: some people don't understand science. This has exactly zip to do with their sex (in the biological sense, although their gender in the cultural sense may have impeded the accessibility of scientific learning). Some people ignore science; this has exactly zip to do with their sex. Let's stop making it about that, okay?

I would love to have a t-shirt advocating science, but I would never wear that slogan. So let's come up with a new one, one that doesn't rely on "putting women [and women-y men] in their place." I would love to see smart people, people who have a good sense of comic wit, working on this. I'm sure Randall Munroe of xkcd could do a lot better than jumping on the "bitch" bandwagon:


I'm open to suggestions. When I find one I can wear proudly, I'll take it to cafe press and slap it on a t-shirt.


StumbleUpon.com

21 comments:

  1. "Bitches" in this instance is not being used to refer to women specifically. The fact that a word can mean something does not mean that it always does. This is pretty basic. Deal w/it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry Anon, but that kind of attitude is exactly why this is a problem. If I call you a fag, it doesn't matter if you are gay or not, its still a derogatory term insulting your sexuality.

    "Bitches" is a word along the same lines as that, can you see the shirt now "Science, it works Fags"

    Bitch should only be used to refer to a female canine in heat, as fag should only be used to refer to a British cigarette. Dictionaries, they are interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Science: it works!

    idk i think it has the same impact without the omg i want to puke my guts out connotations.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Science: it works, republicans!

    In all seriousness, I do think that it's not a great phrase, but I can understand that the humor in it comes from a juxtaposition of "science", which is generally thought of as somewhat formal, stuffy, and highbrow, with the word "bitch", the use of which is typically considered lowbrow, vulgar, and a sign of a lack of education. It isn't a laughing-out-loud humor, but it is there. Do you have another suggestion that would carry the same kind of vulgar connotation without being demeaning? Perhaps "Science, making the world better 'n shit" or "Fucking magnets, how do they work? Science!".

    ReplyDelete
  5. If one wanted to be *very* provocative, a slogan to use could be:
    "Science, it works -- just don't tell god!"

    More politically savvy, I'd suggest:
    "Science, it works -- you just don't board a sled when you fly home".

    But that's too long.
    What about:
    "Science, it works -- what's the time?"

    ReplyDelete
  6. To the second anonymous, thank you for schooling the first anonymous.

    pgrmdave, that's exactly what I was thinking. It should still have that silent bite of humor. I like the republican one.

    Luciano, I kind of like that third one. How about something like, "Science--it's like magic but reproducible," or "Science--it works. Religion is still on welfare."

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just so you know, Randall Munroe isn't new to the "bitches" bandwagon. He coined the phrase "Science: It works, bitches".

    http://xkcd.com/54/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anon, I've seen that one, but didn't realize how old it was.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What about:
    "Science -- it's magic but you can learn it"

    ReplyDelete
  10. The more I think about the word "bitch", the more it disgusts me. There are LAYERS and LAYERS of etymology that continue to insult women all the way back to its origin...

    Its origin is, however, in the observed activities of animals. Its insult payload is derived from the context of the animal, in this case a Canine, female, doing what female canines will do. "Why is that dog making so much noise and acting out? Oh, it's a bitch and it's in heat? Well that explains it."

    Mind you, none of this makes it morally right... this is just etymology.

    We'd need to find some sort of animal whose behavior we find objectionable even above those similar to it to make it stand out, and does so regardless of its gender.

    What's worse is, it's hard to find something nearly as ubiquitous in human experience as good old Canis Lupus Familiaris, let alone something that is as universally objectionable as an animal's behavior under the interference of its desire to mate, which our prudish background could always take issue with. Sex is evil, don'chaknow.

    Cockroaches? Cockroaches are disgusting and relatively universal signs of disease and pollution, but they don't exactly wander around screaming into megaphones. Also, they don't carry that satisfying aura of repugnance and loud obnoxiousness that "Science: IT WORKS, ______" needs.

    Mosquitos? They're extremely annoying, that's for sure... Getting bit usually gets someone's attention; also that buzzing! UGH! They project an entire aura of malevolence and betrayal--they feed on your BLOOD, after all!

    Sharks? They're scary and command a measure of respect...

    Honestly, the only reason I can't nominate Sara Palin is because of so many palinesque idiots who worship her. She's even more frightening than sharks because her brand of stupid seems contagious! Also it doesn't help the cause of feminism that she IS, after all, female -_-;

    Bush? I can't stand that some people actually LIKED him. Unfortunately for our purposes, the wasn't nearly loud or obnoxious enough even as president of the united states; his social ineptitude is so vast that it even disqualifies him as an insult--isn't that something!

    In fact, Rush Limbaugh seems to be QUITE loud, and QUITE stupid. People seem familiar enough with him, but again, his palinesque contagion is also effectively discouraging.

    No, I'm thinking we'll have to go back to animals; something so old and constant that it may very well never fade out of cultural relevance.

    I've heard it said that Human Children are quite obnoxious and stupid, and inevitably end up growing out of it; but do we really want to belittle individuals that are going to already have a rather shitty time with our poorly designed school system and its draconian policies?

    I suppose by now I'm just drawing a blank. Maybe we'll just have to make up a word. Something that's one syllable long and sounds really caustic so people will enjoy saying it before they even know what it means; then we can tell them it means loud, obnoxious, annoying, hypocritical, and particularly dim-witted people. I'm afraid they'd just say "Oh, you mean like a Bitch?" then -_-

    ReplyDelete
  11. Argh! I hate the whole use of the word "bitch" in any setting like this.

    As a woman scientist I would probably take direct action and pour something chemical and permanent on anyone wearing a t-shirt like that.

    Not to harm them, but to make a point that it is an unacceptable comment at all levels.

    The education system does its best to put women (and a hell of a lot of men) off science, so we don't need help to make things worse.

    ReplyDelete
  12. When a word becomes such a widely accepted colloquialism, its original meaning becomes diluted. Yes, I understand that the word "Bitch" can be used in a derogatory sense, and often is. However, it's important to realize that a word is only hateful or degrading if it is said in a hateful or degrading way.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anon, under what context (apart from women trying to reclaim the term and make it into a positive) do you think "bitch" is not derogatory? Because the above example is very obviously derogatory. As my post and pgrmdave brought out, that is the entire point of the saying.

    ReplyDelete
  14. PlusSizedWomanistDec 22, 2010 03:29 PM

    "Science, it works, DAMN IT!"

    See, it's not that hard.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "Science, it works, DAMN IT!"

    o.0 Simple. Masterful. I love it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. There is, of course the song entitled "I'm a bitch". I have seen "bitch" used in a positive context, usually contradicting the negative use specifically in a way that it refers to the exact same qualities in a complimentary manner, rather than a criticism.

    For instance:
    While someone may call a woman a bitch because they are angered by the fact that said woman is not appealing to womanly stereotypes....
    "What a bitch."
    ...I have heard a woman call another woman or group of women a bitch or bitches because she is proud of her/them for not appealing to womanly stereotypes.
    "My bitches stood up and showed THEM how it's done!"

    Also, I have heard women call themselves bitches to declare intense disregard for not appealing to womanly stereotypes.
    "I'm a bitch. DEAL WITH IT!"

    But these aren't cures for the problem; they're symptoms of it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Oh, and furthermore, I believe I recall occasions where women have called MEN bitches in a complimentary manner. In college, at the gaming club, one of the guys was a rather serious feminist. The women there had occasionally praised his rejection of male stereotypes and personal security regarding actions others referred to (derisively) as 'feminine' by proclaiming him to be a fellow bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Palaverer, I've just discovered your site through your comment on Friendly Atheist. I'm very glad that you wrote this post. I've never encountered that saying with the B-word added before, and not only would I never dream of using it, I would object to it vociferously if I had heard or read it.

    On a number of occasions when someone has questioned my emphasis on science, I've said "because it works" with a tone gently suggesting that it should be obvious to them, not to imply that they're stupid, but simply to appeal to their common sense.

    It's unfortunate that some people who want to promote rationalism think they need to sound hip or cool by tacking on contrived slang or catch phrases that are the fad of the month. Just say it straight and let the strength of your stated or implied argument show through. Why? Because it works.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well said, Richard. Thanks for commenting.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Bitch has evolved to mean "punk" or "asshat" as well. Takin' it back bitches!

    ReplyDelete